当前位置:循环首页>正文

[TCT2007]Comparison Study on Simple Versus Complex Stenting of Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions in daily practice in Chinese patients GAO Zhan YANG Yue-jin

作者:国际循环网   日期:2007/11/5 14:44:00

国际循环网版权所有,谢绝任何形式转载,侵犯版权者必予法律追究。

GAO Zhan, YANG Yue-jin, XU Bo, CHEN Ji-lin, QIAO Shu-bin, YAO Min, CHEN Jue, WU Yong-jian, LIU Hai-bo, DAI Jun, YUAN Jin-qing, LI Jian-jun, GAO Run-lin

Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute & Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100037, China

Keywords: percutaneous coronary intervention•drug eluting stent•bifurcation

Abstract:

Background  Recently, several randomized and controlled trials have demonstrated great advantages of drug eluting stent (DES) with respect to significant reduction of restenosis and recurrence of symptoms and improvement of clinical outcomes after PCI. Little is known about the comparative effects of one DES plus kissing balloon technique with two DES for bifurcation angioplasty in Chinese population.
Methods  From April 2004 to June 2006, 566 consecutive Chinese patients underwent DES  implantation for true bifurcation lesions including 346 one DES with kissing balloon technique (3OO male, 57.7±11.5 years old) and 220 two DES (183 male, 58.1±10.7 years old) were analyzed. Clinical and angiographic follow-up was performed at 7 months.
Results  Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) rate was higher in two DES group than one DES group (5.5% vs 2.0%; p=0.032), which was mainly contributed by acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (4.5% vs 1.4%; p=0.032) rather than death and target lesion revascularization (TLR) (0% vs 0.5; p=0.389 and 1.4% vs 2.7%; p=0.352). Stent thrombosis rate was higher in two DES group than one DES group (0.6% vs 2.7%; p=0.042), except for one late stent thrombosis in two DES group, all of them were subacute stent thrombosis (2 in one DES group and 5 in two DES group). 7 months Angiographic follow-up rate was 36.4%. In main branch there was no difference of restenosis rate in one DES group compared with two DES group (9.8% vs 11.9%; p=0.652), but in side branch the restenosis rate was higher in one DES group (33.6% vs 15.5%; p=0.004), however, there was no difference of in-segment late loss between two groups either in main branch or in side branch.
Conclusion  Compared with two DES strategy, if final kissing balloon could be achieved, one DES strategy maybe more efficient and safe.

版面编辑:国际循环



经皮冠状动脉介入治疗药物洗脱支架分叉病变TCT2007TCTPCI

分享到: 更多


设为首页 | 加入收藏 | 关于我们 | 联系方式 | 招贤纳士
声明:国际循环网( www.icirculation.com)对刊载的所有文章、视频、幻灯、音频等资源拥有全部版权。未经本站许可,不得转载。
京ICP备15014970号-5  互联网药品信息服务资格证书编号(京)-非经营性-2017-0063  京公网安备 11010502033353号  增值电信业务经营许可证:京ICP证150541号
国际循环 版权所有   © 2004-2024 www.icirculation.com All Rights Reserved
公司名称:北京美赞广告有限公司 公司地址:北京市朝阳区朝阳门北大街乙12号天辰大厦1座1409 电话:010-51295530